We show analytically that our algorithm is optimal on average. Hence our first contribution is to fill an important gap in the area, since no average-optimal algorithm existed for multiple approximate string matching.
We consider several variants and practical improvements to our algorithm, and show experimentally that they are resistant to the number of patterns and the fastest for low difference ratios, displacing the long-standing best algorithms. Hence our second contribution is to give a practical algorithm for this problem, by far better than any existing alternative in many cases of interest. On real life texts, our algorithm is especially interesting for computational biology applications.
In particular, we show that our algorithm can be successfully used to search for one pattern, where many more competing algorithms exist. Our algorithm is also average-optimal in this case, being the second after that of Chang and Marr. However, our algorithm permits higher difference ratios than Chang and Marr, and this is our third contribution.
In practice, our algorithm is competitive in this scenario too, being the fastest for low difference ratios and moderate alphabet sizes. This is our fourth contribution, which also answers affirmatively the question of whether a practical average-optimal approximate string matching algorithm existed.